Chapter 15 of 17 · Company Law and Practice

Meetings of Board and its Committees

54 questionsasked in 15 of 15 attempts7 law changedOrder: by topic, latest first

Chapter weightageCh. 14Ch. 16
Questions per attemptTap a bar to filter
December 2025Q. 6(d)5 marksSyllabus 2022

(d)Draft a specimen of minutes of a board meeting of Que Private Ltd. in which the agenda item for alteration of object clause of Memorandum of Association was transacted.

Read in the manual: S.13 S.118
December 2024Q. 5(e)4 marksSyllabus 2017

(e)Draft a specimen format of minutes of the board meeting and include therein a specimen resolution passed for declaration of interim dividend in the light of the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Read in the manual: S.118 S.123
December 2024Q. 6(d)5 marksSyllabus 2022

(d)You are requested to draft sample minutes of a board meeting in which the transaction of a share transfer, along with the usual items of business, was conducted, in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013

Read in the manual: S.118 S.56
June 2024Q. 6A(iii)5 marksSyllabus 2022OR, alternative to Q. 6

(iii)Rohit, a director of a company to know the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 relating to inspection and extract of minutes of the Board meetings by the director, member and other persons and preservation period thereof. Explain.

Read in the manual: S.118Also asked in: June 2025, Q. 5(e)
December 2018Q. 2(b)3 marksSyllabus 2017

(b)Minutes of the meetings of the company shall be preserved for a period of not less than eight years. Comment with reference to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Read in the manual: S.118
December 2020Q. 6(a)4 marksOld syllabus

(a)RST Ltd. proposes to convene the board meeting for approval of the Board’s report through video conferencing and seeks your advice for the same. Further clarify who will be signing the Board’s report as per the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013?

Read in the manual: S.134
June 2019Q. 5(d)4 marksSyllabus 2017Law changed
Law changed after this attempt: SS-1 para 3.3 revised: directors through electronic mode count for quorum except for restricted items, where quorum is by physical presence; para 1.2.3 allows electronic participation on restricted items only if a quorum is physically present. (ICSI Supplement, June 2025). The answer below reflects the law as it stood for June 2019.

(d)Referring to the provision of Companies Act, 2013 advise the directors of a company in the following matters :

(i)The company wishes to obtain approval of the financial statement in a meeting held through video conferencing.

(ii)Due to urgency, the company wants to get its prospectus approved in a meeting held through video conferencing.

Read in the manual: S.134Also asked in: December 2018, Q. 4(b)
June 2024Q. 5(a)4 marksSyllabus 2017

(a)On receipt of the notice and agenda notes from MNO Ltd., Kamal, Director has requested for participation through video conferencing on the scheduled date of the meeting. As a Company Secretary, what should be your advice to the Chairperson of the Board ? Also, can the Chairperson attend the Board meeting through video conferencing ? Advise the Company in the matter.

Read in the manual: S.173
June 2024Q. 6(b)5 marksSyllabus 2022

(b)Draft a specimen of notice of the Board Meeting considering the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Read in the manual: S.173Also asked in: December 2025, Q. 6(a)
December 2023Q. 5(d)4 marksSyllabus 2017Law changed
Law changed after this attempt: Reg. 29 revised: prior intimation to stock exchanges of a board meeting for financial results is now at least two working days in advance (excluding the dates of intimation and meeting). (ICSI Supplement, June 2025). The answer below reflects the law as it stood for December 2023.

(d)The meeting of Board of Directors (BOD) of Amarchand Lalchand Exports limited, a listed company was called on Sunday, the 9th July, 2023 for consideration of quarterly financial results. One of the directors has recently shifted his residence and his present contact details have not been provided to the company. Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 explain the period of notice, mode of service of notice to all directors including the director whose changed contact details are not available with the company and compliance requirement of intimating the stock exchange/s.

Read in the manual: S.173
December 2023Q. 6A(i)5 marksSyllabus 2022OR, alternative to Q. 6

(i)Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act. 2013 read with SS-1 explain, whether the board meeting can be convened at a shorter notice and what are the conditions subject to which such meeting may be held ? When shall the decision of the Board taken at the meeting called at a shorter notice come into effect, if the company does not have an independent director ? Also, state the venue for the Board meeting, if conducted through video conferencing/ audio-video means where directors participated from the different places/cities.

Read in the manual: S.173
June 2023Q. 4(c)5 marksSyllabus 2017

(c)The Board of directors of ABC Limited met thrice in the year 2021 and 4th meeting though called but could not be held for want of quorum. Examine with reference to the relevant provisions of the Companies Act 2013, whether any provision of the Act has been contravened?

Read in the manual: S.173
December 2022Q. 5(b)4 marksSyllabus 2017

(b)A company which has Rs. 13 crore of paid-up share capital is intending to have a board meeting on 12th December, 2022. Its managing director wants to know the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 relating to notice of the meeting to directors on the following points :

(i)The date before which the notice needs to be served either by electronic mode or by post ?

(ii)If the company has a predetermined date of 12th of every alternate month for its board meeting, unless otherwise changed, should the notice be sent to the directors every time ?

(iii)In case of urgent exigency can a board meeting be convened at a shorter notice to the directors ?

(iv)Could the notice of Board meeting be issued/sent by any person in the company to the directors ?

Read in the manual: S.173
June 2022Q. 5(d)4 marksSyllabus 2017

(d)A director while leaving India for medical treatment abroad informed the Board of directors that he would not be available for the next six months. During his absence, three Board meetings were held and notices were not sent to him. Is there any default under the Companies Act, 2013 ? What would be the consequences ?

Read in the manual: S.173
December 2021Q. 4(b)4 marksOld syllabus

(b)A Company is desirous of calling an urgent meeting of its board in the next four days. The executive director wants to know from you the process to be followed for convening this meeting?

Read in the manual: S.173
December 2021Q. 5(d)4 marksSyllabus 2017

(d)X is a company secretary of XYZ Ltd. He is of the opinion that the notice, agenda and notes on agenda of the board meeting should be send only to the alternate director and not to the original director of the company. Advice in this matter.

Read in the manual: S.173
December 2020Q. 4(b)5 marksSyllabus 2017

(b)A meeting of the Board of Directors was convened to approve the annual financial statements of the company. The company has a total of 9 directors out of which 4 directors were attending the meeting through video-conferencing while the Chairman and 4 other directors were personally present. Five directors (including the Chairman and those attending the meeting through video conferencing) gave their assent to approve the financial statements while three directors personally present dissented. Can the Chairman consider the financial statements as approved? Explain with reasons.

Read in the manual: S.173
December 2020Q. 5(c)4 marksSyllabus 2017

(c)In a Board of Directors meeting of a private company held on 15th November, 2019 all the directors present, unanimously decided that the next meeting of the Board of Directors would be held on 29th November, 2019 at the registered office of the company. As a Company Secretary do you think a notice of the meeting of the Board of Directors need be sent to ensure legal compliance?

Read in the manual: S.173
December 2020Q. 5(e)4 marksSyllabus 2017

(e)What do you understand by the term “secured computer system' in the context of virtual board meetings?

Can all matters required to be approved by meeting of Board of Directors be approved by video conferencing?

Read in the manual: S.173 S.134
December 2019Q. 4(c)4 marksOld syllabusLaw changed
Law changed after this attempt: SS-1 para 3.3 revised: directors through electronic mode count for quorum except for restricted items, where quorum is by physical presence; para 1.2.3 allows electronic participation on restricted items only if a quorum is physically present. (ICSI Supplement, June 2025). The answer below reflects the law as it stood for December 2019.

(c)FYZ Ltd., an unlisted public company, has six directors on the Board with a quorum of 3 directors physically present for any board meeting. The Company convened a board meeting to approve the annual financial statements in which two out of the six directors participated through video conferencing. The financial statements were approved with the consent of the four directors physically present. Can the financial statements be taken to be validly approved ?

Read in the manual: S.173
June 2019Q. 4(d)5 marksSyllabus 2017

(d)Jolly Retails Ltd. issued a notice for the meeting of its Board of directors scheduled for on 5th June 2019 at its corporate office. One of the directors intimated that he would be participating in the meeting through video conferencing. The Secretary contended that the meeting cannot be participated through video conferencing and that the concerned director cannot insist that the company should provide video conferencing facilities for attending the board meeting. Is the contention of the Secretary tenable as per the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 ? Discuss with relevant case laws, if any.

Read in the manual: S.173
December 2018Q. 4(b)5 marksSyllabus 2017Law changed
Law changed after this attempt: SS-1 para 3.3 revised: directors through electronic mode count for quorum except for restricted items, where quorum is by physical presence; para 1.2.3 allows electronic participation on restricted items only if a quorum is physically present. (ICSI Supplement, June 2025). The answer below reflects the law as it stood for December 2018.

(b)Articles of Reality Ltd. provides that directors participating through audio-visual means in its Board meetings shall always be counted for quorum. Examine the validity of this provision with reference to the Companies Act, 2013.

Read in the manual: S.173Also asked in: June 2019, Q. 5(d)
December 2018Q. 5(d)4 marksSyllabus 2017

(d)A Board meeting of a listed public company was called at shorter notice to transact an urgent business. None of the Independent directors could attend the meeting. Examine the validity of resolution(s) passed at the meeting referring to the provisions of theCompanies Act, 2013.

Read in the manual: S.173
June 2026Q. 5(b)5 marksSyllabus 2022
Show the facts common to all parts of Q. 5

Case Study :

Diya Steels & Aluminium Ltd. (DSAL) was incorporated in December, 2019 in Rajasthan with the objective of manufacturing high quality steels. The plant was commissioned in May, 2021 at a cost of ₹ 250 crores. It was financed partly by the promoters (75%) and balance from bank loan from a consortium of banks. Currently, DSAL is not a listed company but plans to get listed after two years. The registered office is in Jaipur and the plant located in Jharkhand.

Over a period of time, the company has evolved to become one of India’s top ten manufacturers of steel and its accessories. It has a significant share in the domestic and foreign market. It won an award from an Export Promotion Council for upholding highest standards of quality manufacturing activities, processes and preparation and maintenance of adequate cost records.

The company has now eleven hundred members. The Board consists of ten directors with two of them women. You are the Compliance Officer of the company designated as General Manager (Secretarial).

Situation I :

DSAL at the annual general meeting (AGM) held on 28th September, 2023 appointed Arup as a non-executive director for a period of three years. On 10th October, 2024 Arup suffered a severe brain stroke and expired. The Board of directors of the company on 24th October, 2024 appointed Prabhat to fill the casual vacancy so created. The appointment was made for a term of three years by the Board. Subsequently at the AGM held on 19th August, 2025 Prabhat’s appointment was not proposed or approved as the Board was of the view that it is not needed. But the President (Corporate Affairs) is of the view that the company has contravened the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 in respect of non-approval of the appointment of Prabhat and his office tenure at the AGM.

Situation II :

The articles of association of DSAL provides for a maximum of twelve directors. But the company has only ten directors and for two of them Julien and Brice representing foreign collaborators, alternate directors Bapi and Chinmoy have been appointed. Board meeting held on 31st August, 2025 which discussed the matter for issue of rights shares was attended by four directors including two alternate directors.

Situation III :

DSAL showed a net profit of ₹ 56 lakhs after including the following items credited/debited to the statement of profit & loss for year ended 31st March, 2025 for arriving at profit before tax.

ParticularsAmount (in ₹)
Other revenue
Profit on sale of fixed assets5,60,000
Revaluation of assets4,00,000
Change in carrying amount of assets on measurement at fair value7,20,000
Expenditure
Bad debt4,80,000
Loss of capital nature including sale of undertaking2,40,000
Tax expenses, current tax payable12,00,000

Details of sale of fixed assets (in ₹) :

Sale value – 16,00,000; Original Cost – 12,80,000; Written down value – 10,40,000.

Situation IV :

The company had its annual general meeting (AGM) on 19th August, 2025. After completion of all ordinary business as stated in the AGM notice, there was a commotion and disorder at the meeting subsequent to which the Chairman of the meeting adjourned the meeting to 26th August, 2025 though members present did not agree for such adjournment. The Chairman further stated that the unfinished agenda that were listed in the AGM notice alone will be taken up for discussion at the adjourned meeting.

Situation V :

As a separate issue, Bithin – director reported to you that he was possessing two director identification numbers.

Based on the above facts and integrated case, answer the following referring to the provisions of Companies Act, 2013 :

(b)Analyse if the quorum was present in the board meeting held on 31st August, 2025. Will your answer be different if the articles stipulated a quorum of six directors ?

Read in the manual: S.174
December 2024Q. 5(c)5 marksSyllabus 2022
Show the facts common to all parts of Q. 5

Case Study :

Introduction :

Disha Beauty Products Limited (the company), incorporated five years ago with its registered office in Mumbai, India, began manufacturing cosmetic products under the brand name ‘Kasturi.’ The product range includes nail enamel, foundation cream, compact, mascara, eye pencil, etc. Due to its organic composition and maintaining the consistency in the quality the company’s products quickly gained popularity, capturing a significant share of the Indian market. Under the leadership of Disha, the Managing Director, the company experienced growth in turnover and profitability, earning a strong reputation in both consumer and industry circles.

Additional Directors :

To facilitate future expansion, the company intended to appoint Joe and Jogesh as additional directors due to their extensive experience and business acumen. Disha had previously proposed Joe for a regular director position at the Annual General Meeting (AGM), but the motion failed, and Joe was not appointed, Jogesh is proposed to be appointed as an additional director for the first time. The Board of Directors, exercising powers conferred by the Articles of Association, appointed both Joe and Jogesh as additional directors in the board meeting held on 31st March 2024.

The AGM, originally due on 30th September 2024, could not be held on the due date. The company obtained a three-month extension from the Registrar of Companies and held the AGM on 31st December 2024.

Loan/Security to other Company :

The company provided security for a loan of ₹ 25 lakh taken by Rupa Chemicals Limited (RCL), in which Harshal and Sujit, directors of the company, hold 10% and 15% equity shares, respectively, with voting rights. The Secretarial Auditor observed that this transaction might be invalid. The company argues that it has complied with all legal formalities and asserts that none of the directors is interested in RCL as per the law.

Board Meeting :

The Board of Directors planned to issue equity shares to the public and held a meeting on 15th May 2024 to approve the prospectus. Out of the 12 directors, three attended the meeting physically, and one attended via audio-visual means. One other director had informed the company secretary on 1st April 2024, of his intention to attend the next board meeting electronically. The company advised him to attend in person, stating that electronic arrangements could not be made as the intimation of his intention to attend the meeting electronically was not given at the beginning of the calendar year 2024.

Appointment of relative of the Managing Director :

Juley, a company secretary and sister of Disha, the Managing Director, is proposed to be appointed as a ‘Consultant’ with a monthly remuneration of Rs. 2.75 lakh. Disha seeks clarification on the applicable legal provisions concerning this appointment.

Based on the above information and referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 you are requested to address the following :

(c)Determine, whether the quorum was present at the Board meeting held on 15th May, 2024 for the approval of the Prospectus. Additionally, assess whether the company’s advice to a director to attend the meeting in person instead of electronically – due to the notice of electronic participation not being given at the beginning of the calendar year – was valid.

Read in the manual: S.174
June 2024Q. 5(c)4 marksSyllabus 2017

(c)Out of nine directors in Moon Ltd. five are Indians and four are foreign nationals based in Indonesia. The Articles of the Company prescribe that quorum for a Board meeting will be at least 5 directors of which at two be foreign nationals. Comment if such a clause in articles is valid under provisions of Companies Act, 2013 ?

Read in the manual: S.174
December 2023Q. 5(b)4 marksSyllabus 2017Law changed
Law changed after this attempt: SS-1 para 3.3 revised: directors through electronic mode count for quorum except for restricted items, where quorum is by physical presence; para 1.2.3 allows electronic participation on restricted items only if a quorum is physically present. (ICSI Supplement, June 2025). The answer below reflects the law as it stood for December 2023.

(b)The Board Meeting of Western India Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd., an unlisted public company, with Registered Office at Mumbai, was called at 6.00 p.m. on Sunday, the 2nd April, 2023 at Shimla after issuing due notice. The total strength of the Board was 12. Position of two directors was vacant. Five directors attended the Board meeting–two directors including the chairman in person and three other directors through video conferencing from Los Angeles, USA. Having taken the first roll call and, after the chairman confirmed the presence of quorum, the internet connection of the three directors attending through video conferencing got disrupted and they did not attend the rest of the Board meeting. The chairman proceeded with the business of themeeting and declared that all the resolutions listed for the meeting were duly passed as the agenda papers and draft resolutions were already circulated to the directors along with the notice. Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 20l3, decide the validity of the place of the board meeting and resolutions passed.

Read in the manual: S.174
December 2022Q. 5(d)4 marksSyllabus 2017Law changed
Law changed after this attempt: SS-1 paras 3.2 and 3.3 revised: in a private company an interested director is counted for quorum after disclosure; directors through electronic mode count for quorum except for restricted items, where quorum is by physical presence. (ICSI Supplement, June 2025). The answer below reflects the law as it stood for December 2022.

(d)The Board of a company had total strength of 12 directors. There was a vacancy of two directors in the Board. Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 answer the following :

(i)What is the quorum required for the board meeting of the company ?

(ii)In case, nine directors are interested in a particular matter which is to be discussed in a meeting, what shall be the quorum for the meeting under such scenario ?

(iii)In a particular meeting, six directors participated and three of them participated through video conferencing. Would the meeting be considered valid ?

(iv)In the attendance register meant for board meeting, whether directors participating through video/audio-visual means will be entered ?

Read in the manual: S.174
June 2021Q. 2(b)4 marksOld syllabus

Distinguish between the following :

(b)‘Quorum of Board Meeting’ and’ Quorum of General Meeting’

Read in the manual: S.174 S.103
December 2019Q. 4(d)5 marksSyllabus 2017Law changed
Law changed after this attempt: SS-1 paras 3.2 and 3.3 revised: in a private company an interested director is counted for quorum after disclosure; directors through electronic mode count for quorum except for restricted items, where quorum is by physical presence. (ICSI Supplement, June 2025). The answer below reflects the law as it stood for December 2019.

(d)JKJ Ltd. has 10 directors on its Board. A Board meeting was convened on 19- 10-2019 in which two of the directors participated in-person and one director through video conferencing. Two directors were interested in the agenda and hence, did not participate in the meeting. The auditor claimed that the quorum was not present for the meeting to be valid. Do you agree with the auditor ? Justify your answer in reference to provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Read in the manual: S.174
June 2026Q. 6(d)5 marksSyllabus 2022

(d)Due to urgency, the Company Secretary suggested obtaining Board approval by a Circular Resolution for entering into a raw material purchase agreement with JK Suppliers which is an unrelated party. The company has nine directors, out of whom three are interested in the transaction. Two non-interested directors have requested that the matter be discussed and decided at a Board Meeting.

With reference to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 :

(i)Examine whether it is mandatory for the Chairman to place the resolution before a Board Meeting instead of passing it by circulation in the given scenario mentioned above.

(ii)Draft a specimen circular resolution for approval of the purchase of raw material agreement with the Suppliers.

Read in the manual: S.175
June 2024Q. 5A(iii)4 marksSyllabus 2017OR, alternative to Q. 5

(iii)The paid-up capital of Srishti Ltd is rupees ten crore. The Board consists of twelve directors. Out of twelve, three positions are vacant. A resolution for calling a general meeting urgently was sent by circulation for approval. There are three interested directors in the resolution. Two directors out of these three interested directors and one other director require the resolution under circulation to be decided at a meeting and have communicated this to the company. Discuss and advise the Board if the resolution can be passed by circulation.

Read in the manual: S.175
December 2023Q. 5A(iii)4 marksSyllabus 2017OR, alternative to Q. 5

(iii)The Board of Directors of Omega Computer Systems Limited, a listed company, consisted of twelve directors out of which the position of two directors were vacant, The Company Secretary, under the authority of the Chairman, sent a circular resolution on 1st July, 2023 to all directors both by registered post and email. By 7th July, 2023, out of ten directors, six directors assented to the proposal while four directors (including two interested directors) requested convening a proper Board meeting to decide the issue. Referring to the provisions of Companies Act, 2013, decide, whether the resolution by circulation is passed?

Read in the manual: S.175
December 2023Q. 6(b)5 marksSyllabus 2022

(b)SNS Limited is expanding its business in UAE and to look after the business affairs abroad proposes to appoint Vikram as an additional director. He is M. Tech and had done his executive MBA from IIM, Bangalore and has a working experience in corporate sector at a top-management level. Since the next Board meeting is not likely to be held early it is proposed to appoint him as an additional director by obtaining a board approval through resolution by circulation. You are, being a company secretary of the company, requested to draft a resolution by circulation along with brief note thereon for consideration and approval of the directors in compliance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Read in the manual: S.175 S.161
December 2022Q. 5A(iii)4 marksSyllabus 2017OR, alternative to Q. 5

(iii)A company has passed two resolutions by circulation with a majority of five directors where total strength of the board is of nine directors. Two directors required that such a resolution should be decided at the meeting of the Board. Answer the following questions under such scenario referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 :

(a)Whether the claim of the two directors that the resolution should be passed at the meeting of the Board only is valid ?

(b)How the resolution passed by circulation will be recorded in the minutes of the board meetings ?

(c)If the draft resolution was not sent to one director by inadvertent mistake, should the resolution be considered invalid ?

(d)If the single approval has been given by the majority of directors for both the resolutions together, whether such approval will be considered as valid ?

Read in the manual: S.175
December 2021Q. 4(d)5 marksSyllabus 2017

(d)R is a newly qualified CS and seeks your advice on passing of Resolution by Circulation. Advise him suitably as to the procedure to be followed in this regard.

Read in the manual: S.175
December 2020Q. 5A(ii)4 marksSyllabus 2017OR, alternative to Q. 5

(ii)The Chairman of the Board of Directors of Jagruti Printers Ltd. has sent a draft of Resolution along with necessary papers to all the ten directors of the company to get it passed through a resolution by circulation. The last date for signifying the assent or dissent is 20th November, 2019. On 15th November, 2019, six directors communicated their assent while on 17th November, 2019 the remaining 4 directors requested that the resolution must be decided at a meeting. Referring to the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, decide whether the resolution can be deemed to have been passed or requires to be decided at a Board of Directors meeting?

Read in the manual: S.175
December 2025Q. 6(a)5 marksSyllabus 2022

(a)The Audit Committee of T2 Transport Limited has decided to convene its meeting to discuss the finalisation of the quarterly financial statements. You are requested to draft a specimen Notice of the Audit Committee Meeting considering the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Read in the manual: S.177Also asked in: June 2024, Q. 6(b)
June 2026Q. 6(b)5 marksSyllabus 2022

(b)XYZ Foundation, a company registered under Section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013 is engaged in charitable activities and proposes to receive foreign contribution for carrying out its objects. Under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, foreign contribution can be received only in a designated bank account opened with the State Bank of India, New Delhi Main Branch (FCRA Branch), 11 Sansad Marg, New Delhi - 110001, and such account is to be used exclusively for receipt of foreign contribution.

Draft a specimen board resolution for opening the said designated FCRA bank account, and authorising the director and/or the company secretary for doing the needful in this regard under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Read in the manual: S.179
June 2025Q. 5(e)2 marksSyllabus 2022
Show the facts common to all parts of Q. 5

Case Study :

Edge Ltd. was incorporated in November, 2021 in Odisha with the objective of manufacturing water purifier. The plant was commissioned in May, 2022 at a cost of ₹ 400 crore. It was financed partly by the promoters (80%) and balance from bank loan. Currently, Edge Ltd. is not a listed company but plans to get listed in next year.

Over a period of time, Edge Ltd. has evolved to become one of India’s top ten manufacturer of water purifier and is also eyeing to have a share in the export market. It won an award in an all India based trade fair organised by a Chamber of Commerce.

The company has now 300 members. The Board consists of ten directors.

Case I :

Two out of ten directors of the company have retired by rotation at the last annual general meeting. These two vacancies or place of retiring directors is not filled up and the meeting has also not expressly resolved ‘not to fill the vacancy’. Since the AGM could not complete its business, it is adjourned to a later date. Neither place of retiring directors could be filled up at the adjourned meeting nor did the meeting expressly resolve ‘not to fill the vacancy’.

Case II :

Due to diversification and expansion of activities, the board desires to increase the number of directors. In their last meeting, it appointed following two persons as directors :

(a)Amit—He holds directorship in eleven companies including ten public companies. He is a whole-time Chartered Accountant in practice.

(b)Romit—He holds directorship in eight public companies including managing directorship in one and other directorship in seven companies. In addition, he also holds alternate directorship in three private companies.

Case III :

The company has an authorised capital of ₹ 200 lakh and paid-up capital of ₹ 160 lakh. Free reserves are available to the extent of ₹ 120 lakh. Edge Ltd. has advanced a loan of ₹ 128 lakhs to other companies till date. Now the company proposes to advance an interest free loan of ₹ 48 lakh to its wholly owned subsidiary.

Case IV :

29% of equity in the company is held by the Government of Odisha in the name of the Governor of the State. When the company proposed to hold its annual general meeting (AGM) for the last year, the Collector of the district of Ganjam where the company is situated insisted on receiving the notice of the AGM and wanted to attend the meeting.

Case V :

Atanu joined the Board of Edge Ltd. as additional director on 1st January, 2025. On 2nd January, 2025 he sent an email to you, Company Secretary of the company, that he wanted to inspect the minutes of board meeting held on 7th June, 2024 in which the directors’s report for the year 2023-24 was approved.

Based on the above facts and integrated case, answer the following referring to the provisions of Companies Act, 2013 :

(e)Examine if claim of Atanu for inspection of board minutes given in the case is tenable under Companies Act/Secretarial Standards.

Also asked in: June 2024, Q. 6A(iii), December 2018, Q. 5A(iv)
June 2024Q. 4(a)5 marksSyllabus 2017

(a)(i) Meeting of Board of directors of Kasturi Hospitality Private Ltd. was adjourned. D could not attend the original meeting due to preoccupation. He had sought leave of absence on this ground which was granted. There was no extraordinary item of business to be discussed in the original meeting. Notice of adjourned meeting was not sent to D. Comment.

(ii)Saptarshi, a small shareholder director, has specified to the Company Secretary that agenda and notes on agenda for forthcoming board meeting on approval of accounts be sent to him by e-mail. Due to urgency the company had to convene the board meeting at a shorter notice suddenly. The secretary arranged to deliver the agenda and notes thereon by hand at his residence. Saptarshi opposed to this mode of delivery and threatened to resign from the office. Discuss if the objection is tenable in the light of secretarial standards.

June 2024Q. 6(b)5 marksSyllabus 2017

(b)(i) Write a brief note on revenue sharing models for a Mega Firm.]

(ii)In the light of provisions of relevant Secretarial Standard state if the minute book can be in the custody of a senior officer of the company where there is no Company Secretary in the company.

June 2023Q. 4(b)5 marksSyllabus 2017

(b)Draft minutes of 19th meeting of the Board of directors of Zwiggy Foods Ltd held on 28th January, 2022 were circulated on 5th February, 2022. In this backdrop, answer the following:

(i)Sonali, an independent director, who attended the meeting communicated her comments on 15th February, 2022. Do you think her comments can be considered?

(ii)Sujata, a small shareholder director, communicated her comments on 10th February, 2022 but she was absent in the meeting without obtaining leave of absence. Can her comments be taken on record?

December 2022Q. 2(e)3 marksSyllabus 2017

(e)Amrutha has ceased to be a director of CSS Ltd. by resignation. However, she continues to be the shareholder of the company. She now wants to inspect the minutes of the Board meeting in electronic form which she had attended during her tenure as a director of the company. Is she entitled to inspect the minutes of those Board meetings of CSS Ltd. as per the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 ?

June 2022Q. 4(d)5 marksSyllabus 2017

(d)‘The Company Secretary and Chairperson shall take due and reasonable care while handling virtual meeting.’ Evaluate the statement.

June 2022Q. 5(c)4 marksSyllabus 2017

(c)Rajdeep, a director of the company, intimated his willingness to participate in the Board meeting scheduled to be held in August, 2021 through video conferencing. He declared his intention for participation in the scheduled Board meeting through video conferencing mode to company in July, 2021. The Chairman of the company has informed Rajdeep that he has to inform at least 3 months in advance to participate in the Board meeting through video conferencing. Considering the applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, decide whether the action of the Chairman is valid ? Can Rajdeep attend the Board meeting scheduled to be held in August, 2021 through video conferencing ?

June 2022Q. 5A(v)4 marksSyllabus 2017OR, alternative to Q. 5

(v)Explain the following terms with reference to a virtual meeting :

•Electronic mode

•Roll call.

June 2022Q. 6(b)5 marksSyllabus 2017

(b)Company Secretary of Black Ltd. has suggested following style of assigning serial number to its Board meeting :

(i)Serially numbering on Calendar Year basis as follows : "1/2015", "2/2015", "3/2015" and so on....... In the next year, numbering would be "1/2016", "2/ 2016", "3/2016" and so on.

(ii)Serially numbering on financial year basis as follows : "1/2015-16", "2/2015- 16", "3/2015-16" and so on ..........or 1/15-16, 2/15-16, 3/15-16 and so on.

(iii)Continuous serially numbering across years : 11th Meeting, 12th Meeting and so on.

Board of directors of Black Ltd. would like to know that which of the above style of assigning serial number to Board meeting is valid as per Secretarial Standard (SS-1) ? How serial number to the Adjourned Board meeting should be given to comply with SS-1 ?

December 2021Q. 3(a)5 marksSyllabus 2017

(a)Mention the requirements in relation to maintenance of minutes, as prescribed by the Secretarial Standards Board.

June 2021Q. 2A(iv)4 marksOld syllabusOR, alternative to Q. 2

(iv)Lily Ltd. was merged with Rose Ltd. under a scheme of arrangement. The minutes of the Board meetings and general meetings were handed over to Rose Ltd. Advise the Rose Ltd. on the following proposals :

(a)Rose Ltd. proposes to preserve all minutes of Lily Ltd. for next eight years.

(b)Rose Ltd. proposes to keep minutes of its general meetings and board meetings at its factory premises.

December 2020Q. 5A(i)4 marksSyllabus 2017OR, alternative to Q. 5

(i)Dhanvantri is the Chairman of the Risk Management Committee of Advanced Solutions Ltd. A meeting of this Committee of Directors has been scheduled to be held on 5th December, 2019 at 3.00 p.m. At 3.10 p.m. though the requisite quorum is present, Dhanvantri is not present. Can the meeting be still held or requires to be adjourned? Answer with reference to the relevant provisions.

June 2019Q. 4(b)5 marksSyllabus 2017

(b)Prepare an Agenda items for a Board Meeting with a minimum of any eight items to be discussed.

December 2018Q. 3A(iii)4 marksOld syllabusOR, alternative to Q. 3

(iii)The Board of Directors of Tiny Ltd. passed a resolution in its 70th meeting to issue bonus shares. Can Surajit, a director, certify a copy of the resolution when he did not attend the said meeting ? Can a certified true copy of the resolution be given before the minutes of the meeting are signed ?

December 2018Q. 5A(iv)4 marksSyllabus 2017OR, alternative to Q. 5

(iv)Director, Ravi, was appointed on 1st July, 2018. On 2nd July, 2018 he wrote to Managing Director of the company to inspect the minutes of the board meeting held on 1st August, 2017. The Managing Director refused as he was not a director at that time. Ravi attended a meeting held on 1st September, 2018 and resigned on 3rd October, 2018. On 4th October, 2018 he wrote to the Managing Director to send him a copy of the signed minutes of the meeting held on 1st September, 2018. Again, the Managing Director refused. Are the actions of Managing Director valid under Companies Act, 2013/Secretarial Standards ? Comment.

Also asked in: June 2025, Q. 5(e)
No questions in this chapter match these filters.

Also relevant to this chapter

  • June 2026, Q. 6(a) · Alternate director appointed by the original director is invalid; drafting Board resolution (Ch. 13)
  • June 2025, Q. 3(c) · Dormant company: board meetings, conditions for grant of status and MSC-1 attachments (Ch. 11)
  • June 2025, Q. 6(d) · Drafting a board resolution for an abridged annual report; removal of a company secretary in employment (Ch. 16)
  • December 2024, Q. 4(b) · Drafting a board resolution appointing a managing director with remuneration (Ch. 17)
  • December 2024, Q. 6(c) · Drafting a board resolution approving allotment on private placement (Ch. 4)
  • June 2024, Q. 6(a) · Drafting a board resolution appointing a whole-time company secretary and compliance officer (Ch. 17)
  • June 2024, Q. 6(c) · Drafting board resolutions adopting a new CSR policy and approving the Board's report (Ch. 16)
  • December 2023, Q. 4(a) · Meaning of proxy; proxies and representatives for quorum; no proxy at board meetings (Ch. 12)
  • December 2023, Q. 5A(ii) · Questions, proxies and other issues at meetings held through video conferencing (Ch. 12)
  • December 2023, Q. 6(a) · Drafting a board resolution constituting an Audit Committee (Ch. 14)
  • December 2023, Q. 6(d) · Drafting a board resolution adopting a new CSR policy (Ch. 16)
  • December 2022, Q. 2(d) · Prior intimation of board meeting on results, electronic circulation of financial statements and website posting of subsidiary accounts (Ch. 16)
  • June 2021, Q. 3(a) · Specimen board resolution for the abridged annual report, S.136 (Ch. 16)
  • June 2021, Q. 4(d) · Approval of a related party transaction by the audit committee through a circular resolution (Ch. 14)
  • June 2021, Q. 5A(ii) · Procedure for removal of the company secretary (Ch. 17)
  • December 2019, Q. 5(a)(i) · Specimen board resolution recommending dividend out of current profits (Ch. 8)
  • December 2019, Q. 5(a)(ii) · Specimen board resolution recommending dividend out of reserves (Ch. 8)