Chapter 10 of 26 · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency

Fast Track Mergers

12 questionsasked in 7 of 15 attemptsOrder: by topic, latest first

Chapter weightageCh. 9Ch. 11
Questions per attemptTap a bar to filter
D18D20J21D21J22D22J23J24
June 2026Q. 2(a)5 marksSyllabus 2022

(a)Comment (with reasons) whether a scheme of merger or amalgamation under section 233 of the Companies Act, 2013, may be entered between the following companies vide the recent notification of The Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Amendment Rules, 2025 (Notification G.S.R. 603(E) dated 4th September, 2025):

(i)ABC Private Limited, company recognized by the Department for Promotion for Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), incorporated for 5 years, have an annual turnover under ₹ 51 crore, and work toward innovation or improvement of products/processes with XYZ Private Limited, another company recognized by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), incorporated for 9 years, have an annual turnover under ₹ 91 crore, and work toward innovation or improvement of products/processes;

(ii)DEF Private Limited, company recognized by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), incorporated for 9 years 9 months, have an annual turnover under ₹ 95 crore, and work toward innovation or improvement of products/processes with XYZ Ltd, having paid up capital of ₹ 4.5 crore & turnover ₹ 49 crore;

(iii)QWE Private Limited, unlisted company, with aggregate loans/deposits of ₹ 151 crore, no default in repayment, with IOP Private Limited, another company without profit motive, designed to promote commerce, art, science, etc.

(iv)ABC Ltd. (listed & transferor) with its subsidiary company MNP Ltd. (unlisted & transferee);

(v)ABC Ltd. (unlisted & transferor) with MNP Ltd. (unlisted & transferee), both are subsidiary of XYZ Ltd.

December 2025Q. 2(d)5 marksSyllabus 2022

(d)Under the Companies Act, 2013, the concept of a “small company” was introduced to promote ease of doing business for entities with limited financial and operational scale. You are a large consulting firm and tasked with assessing whether the following companies qualify as “small companies” for the financial year 2024-25, as per Section 2(85) of the Companies Act, 2013 (post-September 2022 amendment) so as to enable them to enjoy various compliance relaxations and benefits. Give reason for your classification.

Name of the CompanyPaid up capitalTurnover (inNotes relating to the relevant
(in crores)crores)company
Agoya Pvt. Ltd.447Wholly owned by family members.
Excelibur Services Pvt. Ltd.3.9636.651% owned by Joy Pvt. Ltd.
Glider Pvt. Ltd.225A company incorporated under a Special Act
Jamna Pvt. Ltd.440Registered under Section 8
Gorda Private Limited3.6638.2Wholly owned by family members.
June 2025Q. 2A(iv)5 marksSyllabus 2022

(iv)ABC Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013, providing Information Technology & allied services, wants to merge with its USA based wholly owned holding company, Silicon Valley Inc. Managing Director of ABC Ltd. seeks your advice on the matter citing the recent amendments etc. if any.

December 2024Q. 1(c)5 marksSyllabus 2017

(c)Section 233 of the Companies Act, 2013 outlines a list of conditions which companies proposing to enter into fast-track mergers are required to follow. Mention the conditions.

December 2024Q. 2A(i)5 marksSyllabus 2022Law changed
Law changed after this attempt: Rule 25(1A) of the CAA Rules was amended w.e.f. 4 September 2025 to expand fast-track mergers under S.233 beyond start-ups to holding and subsidiary companies, fellow subsidiaries, and unlisted companies with debt up to Rs. 200 Crore (July 2026 study material, Lesson 10, pp. 360-363; December 2025 supplement). The answer below reflects the law as it stood for December 2024.

( i )Outline a list of conditions which companies proposing to enter into fast-track mergers are required to follow under Section 233 of the Companies Act, 2013 along with Rule 25 of the Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016.

December 2023Q. 2A(ii)5 marksSyllabus 2017

(ii)As a practicing Company Secretary, a client has approached you and sought your guidance on following procedural aspects of Fast Track Mergers.

(a)Declaration of Solvency

(b)Filing of Scheme

(c)Approval of the Scheme

Prepare a brief note on the aforesaid points to be presented to your client.

December 2023Q. 3(d)3 marksSyllabus 2017Law changed
Law changed after this attempt: Rule 25(1A) of the CAA Rules was amended w.e.f. 4 September 2025 to expand fast-track mergers under S.233 beyond start-ups to holding and subsidiary companies, fellow subsidiaries, and unlisted companies with debt up to Rs. 200 Crore (July 2026 study material, Lesson 10, pp. 360-363; December 2025 supplement). The answer below reflects the law as it stood for December 2023.

(d)QR Private Limited, a Start-up company proposes for merger with MN Private Limited a small Company. Explaining the meaning of ‘Start-up’, brief whether the merger proposal can be carried out without the approval of the National Company Law Tribunal. If yes, name the authority with whom they have to approach for such merger.

December 2019Q. 3(c)3 marksOld syllabus

(c)Rama Khadi Industries Ltd. is a fully owned subsidiary of Karishma Gramudyog Ltd. a State Government Company. The State Govt. took a policy decision to amalgamate the former with the latter. Illustrate briefly the steps to be taken in the matter.

June 2019Q. 1(b)5 marksSyllabus 2017

(b)The Board of directors of MNM Ltd., a small company is considering to merge with BRQ Ltd., another small company. The Board wants the merger to be fast and seeks your opinion about the conditions to be complied in this respect. Render your opinion based on the provisions of Companies Act, 2013.

June 2019Q. 2(c)5 marksSyllabus 2017

(c)“Under Companies Act, 1956 small companies were deterred from entering into mergers owing to the lengthy process and the Companies Act, 2013 provided a solution”. Comment.

June 2019Q. 2A(iii)5 marksSyllabus 2017

(iii)Brakes Ltd., a small company manufacturing brakes proposes to merge with Lubricants Ltd., another small company. Registrar of Companies (ROC) objected the scheme on the ground that it is not in the interest of the creditors. Comment on further steps as per Companies Act, 2013.

June 2019Q. 3(d)3 marksSyllabus 2017Law changed
Law changed after this attempt: The paid-up capital and turnover thresholds for a small company under S.2(85) were amended from Rs. 50 Lakh and Rs. 2 Crore to Rs. 4 Crore and Rs. 40 Crore w.e.f. 15 September 2022, with enabling limits up to Rs. 10 Crore and Rs. 100 Crore in 2025 (July 2026 study material, Lesson 10, p. 368). The answer below reflects the law as it stood for June 2019.

(d)“Small Companies can only opt for Fast Track Mergers” — Elucidate briefly for identifying small companies.

No questions in this chapter match these filters.